xboxscene.org forums

Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: I Thought They Were 10 Gb's?  (Read 200 times)

ratpoison

  • Archived User
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 28
I Thought They Were 10 Gb's?
« Reply #15 on: February 16, 2005, 05:09:00 PM »
QUOTE(dIsEaSe @ Feb 16 2005, 05:45 AM)
199.99 is way too much for a 160 tongue.gif
Logged

lordvader129

  • Archived User
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5860
I Thought They Were 10 Gb's?
« Reply #16 on: February 16, 2005, 05:25:00 PM »
QUOTE(ratpoison @ Feb 16 2005, 05:15 PM)
7.5 gig difference. Heck, that's like 2 ... <ahem> ... software packages... smile.gif allll the diff.
Logged

ratpoison

  • Archived User
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 28
I Thought They Were 10 Gb's?
« Reply #17 on: February 16, 2005, 09:46:00 PM »
QUOTE(lordvader129 @ Feb 17 2005, 12:31 AM)
well its not liek some companies ise 1000 and others dont, all 160s are roughly 152 so really it doesnt make a difference
Logged

The Fiend

  • Archived User
  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 51
I Thought They Were 10 Gb's?
« Reply #18 on: February 16, 2005, 10:10:00 PM »
Analogies aren't needed here. I understand completely... The problem was that xboxhdm formatted my hdd with wrong partition values. I used the slayer format method mentioned earlier in this thread and that fixed it for the most part, I gained about 1.5 gigs on my E drive, and F is the correct size now. Oh well, I'm happy with the results I guess.

Thanks for the help,
The Fiend
Logged

Trevante

  • Archived User
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 743
I Thought They Were 10 Gb's?
« Reply #19 on: February 16, 2005, 10:33:00 PM »
QUOTE(FallsInc @ Feb 12 2005, 01:26 AM)
here is the layout
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
« previous next »