What, exactly, is the vetting process for people uploading the abgx360 checksums and files? Is all the data uploaded by a small team explicitly trusted (and personally known) by the abgx360 developers, or is it gathered via a distributed community where there is little to no verification of a person's identity (or where it's possible to gain their trust over a period of time while still remaining anonymous)?
If submitters are not personally known to the developers, what would stop an MS employee (or a number of them working together in order to fool any "strength in numbers" verification the system has) from submitting poisoned entries to the database? If MS could get incorrect entries into the database, you'd really be patching *in* a bright red flag that tells MS to come get you when you "fix" your rips with abgx360. Digital marked bills, as it were.
I've seen a Kreon drive make rips that have only verify through abgx360 around 50% of the time - you'd think home rips would be 100% verified. As I see it, that means either:
1) the Kreon drive is making bad rips (strange that some rips would verify fine though)
2) there are multiple valid checksums for one title, and the specific checksums on the titles that didn't validate were just not the ones in the database
3) the abgx360 database is incorrect (possibly poisoned)
[EDIT]: Whoops, beaten by 14 minutes above. Go me and taking 20 minutes to write a post!
This post has been edited by IonBlade: Nov 7 2009, 07:27 PM