QUOTE(PirateElf @ Jan 6 2008, 04:20 AM)

Which they did by offering us a free game. That's more than fair for me.
Completely agree. As long as it is one I don't already have or some crap like Asteroids. But I know a game's beauty is in the eye of the beholder
QUOTE(jeffrey92 @ Jan 6 2008, 05:02 AM)

I see the free game is them admitting they screwed up. They may have apologized, but I have yet to see any real assurance that my live will work next year. It would make me feel a lot better if they said that in 2008 they would be staffing more people for xbox live, and vastly upgrading live's player capacity.
Again, I agree, the offer of a game is an admittance, but then when did they not to admit to having an issue? What I have a grievance with is the status page not being up to date. Stating everything is running OK is a flagrant lie.
Why do you feel they need more Live staff? I have no comprehension how many staff they have at all, but you can have too many people working on an issue and then lose focus. Quality over quantity when it comes to a service issue on this magnitude I say.
I think they need more servers and higher network bandwidth, not more staff.
I am still having Live issues.
- Taking over a minute to give me a blade
- Not able to join games I am invited to
- Lag
- Not able to send messages.
QUOTE(jeffrey92 @ Jan 6 2008, 05:02 AM)

A free game is nice, but maybe the lawsuite will teach them that they need to pay a little more attention to Live and that this crappy service just isn't ok. And although this is one of the worst downtimes, xbox live has been like this a lot more than just once in five years.
Is a lawsuit really the answer here? Any costs incurred by Microsoft will only be passed onto the consumer with more expensive hardware, software and services. They could even let Live go the same way as the PS3 version. Make it free, but have no synergies across games, and the entire environment. I don't want this.
I am 100% confident Microsoft have learnt from this debacle. However, I would like to see that publicly announced once the problems are resolved.
What I find annoying was the fact, English was not the first language of the helpdesk staff, the guy on the phone even told me I am more knowledgeable than he is. OK, I am an IT consulant of many years, with many accreditations, but I have no Live support experience. His level of diagnosis literally ran to, "can you perform the network test please." A joke.
I have never made so many posts in a month, as I have in just two days in this thread. LOL. Indicative of how fed up with it I am. Everyone is emotional over this issue, anger, sympathy etc, but let's keep things in perspective. If Live wasn't so great most of the time, then this problem would be less tangible. But it is great and they have had a serious hic-cup, but shouting about buying PS3's, canceling Live and suing is not the answer.
MS need to improve their communication to their users. Take the servers offline for a couple of days if necessary and upgrade the infrastructure. I would rather it be down and I know they will have it resolved then to carry on this half arsed, works now, doesn't work now fashion.
Can i just sue for Vista instead? I was definitely mis-represented over that. What a pile of crap. Even drag and dropping files has stopped working for me, even after a reboot. Had this issue a while ago but it went away. It's worse than Windows ME in many ways.