Yeah, sorry 'bout that, I should have been more clear about the 720/1080 thing (It's really late, I ought to have gone to bed by now... shame on me.) - I meant that the amount of data being processed simultaneously is greater. From what I remember reading, 1080i HD streams (mpeg2, the stuff being used for standard ATSC) are running at 60 Mbits per second at present (Granted that also includes audio but still...) - That's already quite a bit of data, and that's talking about compressed over-the-air or satellite broadcasts. I shudder to think what kind of data we're talking about once it's decompressed... I'd imagine that since the 360 is running the graphics chip basically as a PC ('specially if you get the VGA output cable, which rocks) it'd be uncompressed data. Just a though though, haven't seen enough on the architecture of the actual chipset or how it's implemented, and to tell the truth that's not my strongest area. Home theater? That I know a decent bit about. Troubleshooting PCs? Sure thing. Designing hardware? Erm... Gimme a few more years in school for that one. Anywho, curious to see what happens with this. (Btw I've left my 360 on overnight for 2 nights in a row, letting it download large demos as I went to bed, with no issues whatsoever as far as heat/etc - at least nothing I could see.) Then again it could also be different in my case because although I've set everything to 720p, the fact that I have a VGA cable on it (1280x1024 on a Sony GDM-F500 21" FD Trinitron flat CRT - great bedroom TV.) could also be a factor. It might be running the data straight out to the monitor instead of compressing it to component out, since the VGA specification has separate leads for red, green, blue, horizontal sync, vertical sync, etc, whereas with component you're embedding that data into an existing line (sync on green etc).
This post has been edited by ArtemisKitty: Nov 26 2005, 07:50 AM