Topic: New Saints Row Pics..... (Read 748 times)

b15ginz · « **Reply #15 on:** September 09, 2005, 09:09:00 PM »

QUOTE(Master X @ Sep 9 2005, 07:01 PM)

This pic looks horrible

(IMG:http://xbox360media.ign.com/xbox360/image/article/649/649457/saints-row-20050908113621423.jpg)

look at the fire ball....go find a pick of GTAs fireball. u guys have no idea what art is

Master X · « **Reply #16 on:** September 10, 2005, 01:39:00 AM »

Thats GTA's in game graphics and thats not Saints Row's in game graphics. That pic that you submitted is the only good looking pic and you chose the worst GTA pic. Why dont you compare the saints row pic that I posted to the GTA pic you posted?

This post has been edited by Master X: Sep 10 2005, 08:40 AM

Master X · « **Reply #17 on:** September 10, 2005, 01:41:00 AM »

QUOTE(b15ginz @ Sep 10 2005, 12:44 AM)

look at the fire ball....go find a pick of GTAs fireball. u guys have no idea what art is

Look at the box car looks like a 20$ PC game graphics.

Tripme · « **Reply #18 on:** September 10, 2005, 07:59:00 AM »

I dont understand how you guys see these screen shots as looking bad. Considering these guys have to learn brand new hardware and that they recieved the final kits not to long ago, I'd say these pics are fuggin pimp. Quit being such hypocrites and give this game some cred.

Carlo210 · « **Reply #19 on:** September 10, 2005, 11:24:00 AM »

QUOTE(Master X @ Sep 10 2005, 09:16 AM)

Look at the box car looks like a 20$ PC game graphics.

Yeah, until you see the car in motion and the reflections on the car of everything around it running flawlessly, the cracks in the bodywork, and the mapping on the headlights, mirrors, and bumpers.

Sure the screen looks like shit. You know why? Becuase all you see is a white 1985 suv. It looks boxy? Well, that's because it's a boxy car. It looks plain and white with no reflections? Well that's because, as you should fucking know, seeing the next-gen shaders and mappers and reflection tech can't be seen in one goddamned frame.
Basically, what you don't see is how realistic that 1985 suv looks in motion, so just stop talking.

Master X · « **Reply #20 on:** September 10, 2005, 01:27:00 PM »

QUOTE(Carlo210 @ Sep 10 2005, 02:59 PM)

Yeah, until you see the car in motion and the reflections on the car of everything around it running flawlessly, the cracks in the bodywork, and the mapping on the headlights, mirrors, and bumpers.

Sure the screen looks like shit. You know why? Becuase all you see is a white 1985 suv. It looks boxy? Well, that's because it's a boxy car. It looks plain and white with no reflections? Well that's because, as you should fucking know, seeing the next-gen shaders and mappers and reflection tech can't be seen in one goddamned frame.
Basically, what you don't see is how realistic that 1985 suv looks in motion, so just stop talking.

ColdReader · « **Reply #21 on:** September 10, 2005, 02:06:00 PM »

well put

mastersloth · « **Reply #22 on:** September 10, 2005, 02:16:00 PM »

QUOTE(ColdReader @ Sep 10 2005, 08:41 PM)

well put

I agree.

brooksie48 · « **Reply #23 on:** September 10, 2005, 02:20:00 PM »

QUOTE(Master X @ Sep 10 2005, 03:14 AM)

Thats GTA's in game graphics and thats not Saints Row's in game graphics. That pic that you submitted is the only good looking pic and you chose the worst GTA pic. Why dont you compare the saints row pic that I posted to the GTA pic you posted?

That GTA pic looks better than GTA actually does.

Anyways you obviously haven't seen the Leipzig video of Saints Row.

brownboi_nayyar · « **Reply #24 on:** September 10, 2005, 02:29:00 PM »

The game doesn't look that bad....

b15ginz · « **Reply #25 on:** September 10, 2005, 08:38:00 PM »

thanks carlo.
in 1980s they didnt have curvy cars. look at the very old boxxy and hell nissan sentras. every year those cars look alike...the nissan toyota...everything.
that game looks just fin amazing.

GTA was a very poor game when u played it. when u sat still not playing it the game lo0oks decent.

GTA was poor. the story line sucked..the ending was ghetoo as hell! worse one ever..i like london better on psx

Master X · « **Reply #26 on:** September 10, 2005, 10:18:00 PM »

I understand that the cars are supposed to be boxy but it doesnt look next-gen.

This post has been edited by Master X: Sep 11 2005, 05:19 AM

Deftech · « **Reply #27 on:** September 10, 2005, 10:30:00 PM »

QUOTE(Master X @ Sep 10 2005, 11:53 PM)

I understand that the cars are supposed to be boxy but it doesnt look next-gen.

true, but compared to any other game in its genre, on any console or pc, it looks 100 times better.

Master X · « **Reply #28 on:** September 10, 2005, 11:31:00 PM »

QUOTE(Deftech @ Sep 11 2005, 02:05 AM)

true, but compared to any other game in its genre, on any console or pc, it looks 100 times better.

Finally someone who agrees with me..... All that I am trying to say is that, the pic with the boxy car doesnt look next gen.

Deftech · « **Reply #29 on:** September 10, 2005, 11:36:00 PM »

No way in hell does it look next gen(my opinion). But the vid shows a lot of shit going on and its impressive to see the lighting, reflections, mayhem. The xbox couldnt do a single car explosion faithfully, let alone several cars on screen with debris going everywhere. The ps2 couldnt do a damn street light in this game.

Next gen is Gears, PGR 3(debatable), War Devil, Dark Sector and so on.

Oblivion looks like a souped up PC game, a very good one ofcourse.

RE 5 is next gen :drool :luv:

Next gen graphics, No, but its not a multi billion $$ studio making it so anyone who expected a title like this to look like Gears was only setting themselves up for dissapointment.

A lot better than anything out there Now? Hell Yes.

Author Topic: New Saints Row Pics..... (Read 748 times)