Print

[Deftech]

(IMG:http://media.teamxbox.com/games/ss/1150/full-res/1123103439.jpg)

(IMG:http://media.teamxbox.com/games/ss/1150/full-res/1123103438.jpg)

This post has been edited by Deftech: Aug 4 2005, 12:55 AM

[Carlo210]

I've been seeing alot of Quake 4 screens. they aren't all that great looking, but for a game thats going to be running at 100fps or so, it should be fine.
And about shooters in this genre, I'm more hyped up about Prey than I am about Quake 4.

[Twasi]

First one is absoloutely horrid except for the mech, the second one is pretty good, slightly better than doom3, no jaggies, floor textures need a ton of work. whens the release date for this?

[Andy51]

I know I am so getting Call of Duty 2 over this.... a single core just for A.I? Whoa man... I'm gettin' Call of Duty 2!

[Deftech]

its using the doom 3 engine, its going to look kinda poopy compared to any of the games using newer ones. Its still very crisp looking though, so that alone is a huige step forward.

No jaggies  

Prey atleast uses an upgraded color palette, where as quake 4 seems to look exactly like doom 3 did.

time for Carmack to make an engine that will actually give the 360 a work out huh?

 

[shazboznian]

I hate the Doom 3 engine...all the edges are square..square heads, jaws, arms...SQUARE SQAURE SQAURE...Although F.E.A.R is looking far more promising, looks amazing. Doom 3 was a good tech demo and the engine to suit but that was 1 and a half years ago. Monoliths F.E.A.R engine is amazing for instance

http://image.com.com/gamespot/images/2005/...1_screen001.jpg

and

http://image.com.com/gamespot/images/2005/...9_screen002.jpg

YEAH!!!

[Infamous_One]

Quaker 4?  

[aepuppetmaster]

this is what i was afraid of, if u look at what ehy promised and then u look at the acutally game,  it is a shit load beter than the xbox but still not what they promised, guess i'll have to wait for the xbox720.......yeah like i'll wait.

[Deftech]

QUOTE(aepuppetmaster @ Aug 4 2005, 02:55 AM)

this is what i was afraid of, if u look at what ehy promised and then u look at the acutally game,  it is a shit load beter than the xbox but still not what they promised, guess i'll have to wait for the xbox720.......yeah like i'll wait.

what who promised?

thats the doom 3 engine maxed out dude, The only major difference between doom 3 on xbox and quake 4 on 360 is the lower res textures, 480p instead of 720p, and xbox has jaggies.

its the 360's fault the doom 3 engine is now considered old?! Carmacks engines are always good tests for rigs and time demos but Ive always like the Unreal engines a LOT more.

you were buying the 360 just for quake 4 and you expected it to look like what? as good as Unreal 3 engine games?

Im confused  

[Moleman]

I don't like the Doom 3 engine, the lights and the shaders look all plasticy.

[Carlo210]

I think we should have some sort of testing session for people who want to sign up before we actually let them post.

[miggidy]

Not bad for a game built on the Doom 3 engine. Although doesn't Prey look better than this?

I could be wrong.
But I'm not complaining here, yes the game doesn't look good as other Xbox 360 titles but it looks good enough.
And if the game play is fun, who cares?

[Deftech]

Yes Prey looks better. They put in a upgraded color palette to give it a fresh look, and it shows.

Please tell me thats not at launch.

Im so glad games Like Gears of War and Huxley arent.

[mcbraders]

ye to me aswell quake 4 jus looks like an upgraded version of doom 3 but ill probly still get it for shits & giggles

[incognegro]

im getting it regardless of what it looks like. Im a big quake fan and ive been waiting forever for this