Topic: Bizarre Lied About Pgr 3 (Read 267 times)

spearfree · « **Reply #15 on:** October 13, 2005, 06:34:00 PM »

QUOTE(brooksie48 @ Oct 14 2005, 02:35 AM)

Thats more theory than a real number. It is similar to the question "how small is a point".

Ballz2TheWallz · « **Reply #16 on:** October 13, 2005, 06:40:00 PM »

QUOTE(spearfree @ Oct 14 2005, 02:45 AM)

lol...sorry for asking stupid question, it's just me that I would like to see a 3D picture (created with any program) set to the max (whatever).

Carlo210 · « **Reply #17 on:** October 13, 2005, 07:30:00 PM »

QUOTE

i dont think we'll need further then 200,000-300,000 polygons for photorealistic car shapes

But there are unlimited polygons on a real car! Forget photorealistic, we'll get to realistic in the next-next gen!

Keshire · « **Reply #18 on:** October 14, 2005, 03:22:00 AM »

QUOTE(twistedsymphony @ Oct 13 2005, 07:18 PM)

SOFTIMAGE.... interesting that they use that, I would have figured Alias Wavefront or 3DS MAX.

~jeff~ · « **Reply #19 on:** October 14, 2005, 09:59:00 PM »

I'm confused, is more polygons bad, or is it better??? I would assume it to be better.

~jeff~

VariableElite · « **Reply #20 on:** October 14, 2005, 10:24:00 PM »

A model rendered with more polygons has the potential to be of higher quality than the same model rendered with fewer polygons. However, developers are limited to what they can eke out of the processor. Most gaming consoles have what is sometimes referred to as a polygon budget, where anything over that amount can lead to FPS loss and slowdown.

The fact that Bizarre used models that were 25% more detailed than anticipated (and announced) is pretty impressive.

Deftech · « **Reply #21 on:** October 14, 2005, 10:29:00 PM »

QUOTE(VariableElite @ Oct 15 2005, 12:35 AM)

Carlo210 · « **Reply #22 on:** October 15, 2005, 09:20:00 AM »

Helios · « **Reply #23 on:** October 17, 2005, 12:50:00 AM »

KAGE360 · « **Reply #24 on:** October 17, 2005, 06:18:00 AM »

kast555 · « **Reply #25 on:** October 17, 2005, 08:10:00 AM »

QUOTE

technology has gotten a crap load better, thats why i laugh at anyone calling the 360 a xbox 1.5.

Me to... how the hell do you get off saying that the 360 is just an xbox juiced up. Hell NO. Did any one see G4tv.com show about X05. They just totally riffed on the xbox 360 and the launch games. Saying "A lot of people believe that 360 is just xbox 1.5. Nothing new brought to the table." If I hear someone else say that, I'm going to reach my hand strait into my LCD screen. I "believe" it will come out of there CRT monitor, and slap them in the face.

redwolf · « **Reply #26 on:** October 17, 2005, 02:23:00 PM »

QUOTE(Helios @ Oct 17 2005, 09:01 AM)

Remember that this is a LAUNCH title. Launch titles are usually bad compared to titles released later. Can you possibly IMAGINE what the games for Xbox360 will be like late next year and the year after? Jesus its gonna be awesome. Its gonna be so funny when we look back on the 360 in a few years time and laugh at it and say 'Ohhh boy wasn't the 360 and PS3 crap' Hahahaha I remember saying that about Playstation when PS2 came out and when Xbox came out I dissed PS2. Lol can't wait to have that happen again with the launch of 360 and PS3

Deftech · « **Reply #27 on:** October 17, 2005, 02:40:00 PM »

Look at the graphical jump between 1 and 2...thats why Im excited for part 4

Author Topic: Bizarre Lied About Pgr 3 (Read 267 times)