Topic: Pd Zero Pics And Vid.. (Read 218 times)

Deftech · « **on:** October 07, 2005, 10:02:00 AM »

http://www.xboxyde.c...ws_2107_en.html

Movie might be the one weve seen, but some parts look different.

chilin_dude · « **Reply #1 on:** October 07, 2005, 10:07:00 AM »

QUOTE(Deftech @ Oct 7 2005, 06:13 PM)

http://www.xboxyde.c...ws_2107_en.html

Deftech · « **Reply #2 on:** October 07, 2005, 10:21:00 AM »

sorry, hard to keep track of what vids i have and dont have, and the same ones were floating around.

gets even harder when threads get huge like that, thats why I thought it was a bad idea for all x05 to go in a single thread, people would have missed out on a lot. I missed quite a bit of pd zero, not knowing which vids were which

Shinamano · « **Reply #3 on:** October 07, 2005, 01:41:00 PM »

Kind of out of the blue...but I wish joanna had green eyes...

Foe-hammer · « **Reply #4 on:** October 07, 2005, 01:44:00 PM »

Not looking too bad.

Atleast the recticle is in the middle of the screen, and it's 90 deg FOV (damn halo 2

).

crobar · « **Reply #5 on:** October 07, 2005, 01:55:00 PM »

QUOTE(corkinator @ Oct 7 2005, 09:48 PM)

Those new pics are funny. It's as if the people at Rare hadn't played a game in the last 5 years and think the water and smoke effects actually look amazing. Then you have bump mapping for the sake of it, with strange textures in strange places giving a real inconsistent look. Not to mention the low poly, low texture enemy models.

Carlo210 · « **Reply #6 on:** October 07, 2005, 02:30:00 PM »

Id be content with basic anti aliasing, really. When you actually liek a game, the 'anti-aliasing' don't keep you going. It's probably one of the smallest details to be paid attention to in a game. Sure, it's nice to have everything look buttery smooth, but that's on top of beautiful shaders, textures, character models, physics, and animations.
Jaggie-freeness is nice to have but, personally, I could live with it. I have discerned it with my ps2 (no anti-aliasing whatsoever of any sort in 380i resolution, not 480i - typical high-end ps2 title). Once you really get engrossed in a game or are having fun, the jaggies dissapear while your eyes are glued to the center of your screen. Now that we are getting high-def resolutions, shaders galore, and at least the basic aax, some of you really shouldn't be complaining. Why don't you just run whatever you are watching your games on in a lower resolution or tone down the sharpness setting. Sure, it doesn't encompass the effects you get from anti-aliasing, but it SHOULD let you live one more day in your gaming life which, to some people, is a very shallow one.

No offense, guys.

Deftech · « **Reply #7 on:** October 07, 2005, 02:47:00 PM »

QUOTE(Carlo210 @ Oct 7 2005, 04:41 PM)

Once you really get engrossed in a game or are having fun, the jaggies dissapear while your eyes are glued to the center of your screen.

incognegro · « **Reply #8 on:** October 07, 2005, 02:58:00 PM »

its funny when i see ppl cry about disappointment.........after x05 i walked away more confident in the 360s power. Crappy looking started to look interesting all of a sudden and theyre just launch games (which is worse than first gen games).........anyways gameplay is always supreme and with all these great developers putting in work for the 360, im loving the nex gen

Deftech · « **Reply #9 on:** October 07, 2005, 03:03:00 PM »

QUOTE(incognegro @ Oct 7 2005, 05:09 PM)

its funny when i see ppl cry about disappointment.........after x05 i walked away more confident in the 360s power. Crappy looking started to look interesting all of a sudden and theyre just launch games (which is worse than first gen games).........anyways gameplay is always supreme and with all these great developers putting in work for the 360, im loving the nex gen

crobar · « **Reply #10 on:** October 07, 2005, 04:29:00 PM »

any one who cry about this AA shit si a fucking fag and needs to get a life...its a fucking game....A GAME i tell you if jaggy lines get you that worked up all gaming up till now must have given you a fucking stroke.

Deftech · « **Reply #11 on:** October 07, 2005, 04:44:00 PM »

that might the lamest thing Ive read here in a year.

congrats...

calling someone a fag because their requirements for a game consists of little to no jaggies, that takes class.

congrats champ, keep up the good work.

if AA wasn't important, it wouldnt be offered in settings for your pc's gpu. And there would be no fuss made over the edram in the 360.

if I didnt care about a good picture, id still use VHS for movies, and not dvd in 480p.

and by that standard, noone should get hd dvd or blu ray just because the picture is cleaner and looks better right?

A good movie is made better by great sound and a great picture, the same applies to games.

again, Congrats.

Carlo210 · « **Reply #12 on:** October 07, 2005, 05:07:00 PM »

Hahaha Go Deftech!
I'm all for getting rid of jaggies, I juat hope I made it clear that if we don't get 2x anti-aliasing, we still won't have the amount of jaggies we've seen in the current gen. I realize that some people, like you Deftech, want more (heck, I would too with a 72" screen).

Anyways, speaking of 'sound', I don't think I'll be getting a surround sound setup anytime soon... TOO MANY FUGGING GAMES!

Deftech · « **Reply #13 on:** October 07, 2005, 05:19:00 PM »

QUOTE(Carlo210 @ Oct 7 2005, 07:18 PM)

Hahaha Go Deftech!

Deftech · « **Reply #14 on:** October 07, 2005, 06:25:00 PM »

lol during the cutscenes, did you see how different the sets were calibrated?

colors in faces were totally different. I wouldnt stand for that shit if I was there, Id be trying to set it up correctly and get kicked out in the process.

maybe it was the angle the camera was at?

Author Topic: Pd Zero Pics And Vid.. (Read 218 times)