QUOTE
I didnt say the good devs will be the only ones that are "able to" use the hdd. I said the good devs will max their games out as if the hdd IS standard, thats a huge fuggin difference.
And neither did I. I said that good devs will be able to take
full advantage of the hdd, when present. Which is exactly what you said. Am i missing something? What the fug are you talking about?
QUOTE
so MS is evil for offering the buyer a choice. But Sony pulls the plug on it and they get a pat on the back, for what?
What the flip are you talking about? I sure the shit am not on Sony's side here. And besides, when did Sony ever lead people to believe there were going to support an hdd standard? While it's great that MS is even offering an hdd in one of its sku's, it sucks that they didn't make it standard; something i was expecting. I never expected the other two companies to even offer an hdd.
QUOTE
the sku's, the pricing, its all genious. GENIOUS!
Good hell, i'm an xbox fan as much as the next hardcore xbox owner, but you're making me throw up; you don't believe all the MS pr bullshit, do you?
How on earth is two sku's genius, from a tech standpoint, and not financial? From a tech view, one sku with a standard hdd would have been better.
My point still stands, that one sku with an hdd would have been better from a dev point of view, and for us. How? As i've stated before, more time, money, and resources will be required to make a game run good off DVD, and as well take full advantage of the hdd when present. This will cause games to take longer to develop then if there was one sku with hdd standard, or make the game be rushed. And other devs will not want to take the extra time/resources to do this. Both case scenarios will affect the end user, that being us.
I'm surprised that you do not see the logic in this.
Take it easy on people who do not smell roses on everything MS has to say.
