Topic: Just Played Call Of Duty Ii... (Read 378 times)

poncho · « **on:** November 07, 2005, 02:13:00 PM »

I did not think the graphics were that much better than the xbox 1.0 version and a lot less than the PC version. Plus, there was a lot of blurring going on in the distant background. Xbox 1.5 minus being able to mod it is not worth the upgrade.

Carlo210 · « **Reply #1 on:** November 07, 2005, 03:08:00 PM »

QUOTE(poncho @ Nov 7 2005, 10:20 PM)

I did not think the graphics were that much better than the xbox 1.0 version and a lot less than the PC version. Plus, there was a lot of blurring going on in the distant background. Xbox 1.5 minus being able to mod it is not worth the upgrade.

Carlo210 · « **Reply #2 on:** November 07, 2005, 03:17:00 PM »

QUOTE(Tango87 @ Nov 7 2005, 11:16 PM)

But you do make a good point about the modding cpabilities

KAGE360 · « **Reply #3 on:** November 07, 2005, 03:36:00 PM »

well i see we have another gem in the forum. everytime i see a xbox 1.5 comment i laugh. oh and the blurring going on in the background is an intentional effect to simulate the heat you see in the distance. i dont see why a dev would lie and say that if you want the best looking version get the 360 version especially when you consider that the install base for playable PCs will be much higher then the number of 360s out there, if i was going to lie it would be to the higher group that i can get the most sales out of. thanks poncho for the chuckle

Deftech · « **Reply #4 on:** November 07, 2005, 03:44:00 PM »

Xbox version of CoD 2 the big red one looks horrid in comparison, good grief.

The list of gems is growing kage? why yes it is indeed!

deftonesmx17 · « **Reply #5 on:** November 07, 2005, 03:53:00 PM »

QUOTE(KAGE360 @ Nov 7 2005, 05:43 PM)

well i see we have another gem in the forum. everytime i see a xbox 1.5 comment i laugh.

at least I have never stooped that low

But I do notice the "blurry things in the distance" in most xbox360 games, whats up with that?

Carlo210 · « **Reply #6 on:** November 07, 2005, 03:55:00 PM »

QUOTE(deftonesmx17 @ Nov 8 2005, 12:00 AM)

at least I have never stooped that low

KAGE360 · « **Reply #7 on:** November 07, 2005, 04:01:00 PM »

QUOTE(deftonesmx17 @ Nov 7 2005, 06:00 PM)

at least I have never stooped that low

Heet · « **Reply #8 on:** November 07, 2005, 04:15:00 PM »

Why are people complaining about the depth of vision effect? I think its one of the coolest effects ive ever seen.

incognegro · « **Reply #9 on:** November 07, 2005, 04:32:00 PM »

QUOTE(deftonesmx17 @ Nov 8 2005, 12:00 AM)

at least I have never stooped that low

deftonesmx17 · « **Reply #10 on:** November 07, 2005, 04:34:00 PM »

QUOTE(KAGE360 @ Nov 7 2005, 06:08 PM)

i dont know what i said to stoop so low

I was talking about the person who made the xbox 1.5 comment

QUOTE(Heet)

Why are people complaining about the depth of vision effect? I think its one of the coolest effects ive ever seen.

I have no problem with the effect, just when it is in games where it is not needed. It seems developers add it to games for no good reason besides to say look at the effect, doesnt it look cool.

Its over used like motion blur was this last generation.

Ballz2TheWallz · « **Reply #11 on:** November 07, 2005, 08:51:00 PM »

QUOTE(Carlo210 @ Nov 7 2005, 11:15 PM)

At least you don't expect credibility.

ravage73 · « **Reply #12 on:** November 07, 2005, 09:02:00 PM »

cod 2 looks better on the pc.

Foe-hammer · « **Reply #13 on:** November 07, 2005, 11:31:00 PM »

QUOTE(ravage73 @ Nov 7 2005, 08:09 PM)

cod 2 looks better on the pc.

ravage73 · « **Reply #14 on:** November 08, 2005, 06:06:00 AM »

QUOTE(Foe-hammer @ Nov 8 2005, 02:38 AM)

straight from the devs mouth.

Author Topic: Just Played Call Of Duty Ii... (Read 378 times)