Print

[KAGE360]

QUOTE

Eurogamer: One of the things we're seeing quite a bit of with first-generation 360 software is developers making use of just one or two of the console's processors. To what degree have you been making use of the console's new technology?

Climax: We started off on one processor and then we've spread out as we've gone along. By the time our game comes out, we'll be using all of the processor threads at least some of the time. There will still be a lot more untapped power to be had though. We're gunning for 4x anti-aliasing with 20 bikes at 60 frames per second so we're having to push quite hard.

even though the journalist made the mistake of saying that first gen. 360 games use only one or two cores i think what the developer says gives us something to be excited about.

[twistedsymphony]

720p, 4xMSAA, 60FPS, 20+Bikes....

:drool:  

[Shinamano]

Yeah...I think I need that game

[Deftech]

QUOTE(twistedsymphony @ Jan 17 2006, 04:55 PM)

720p, 4xMSAA, 60FPS, 20+Bikes....

:drool:  

I could Not have responded in a better way!!

This is the best I can do...

:drool:  


:drool:  


:drool:  

I like the following in the Splinter interview...

QUOTE

Daniel Roy: Let me first say that Sam never 'chooses' the JBA over Third Echelon. We've endeavored to stay away from this 'Good vs. Evil' simplistic duality. The choices Sam is faced with are more between his sense of morality, and the difficult things he has to do for his mission.

As an example, early on in the game, Sam is ordered by the JBA to shoot an innocent man. Does he refuse, thus seriously compromising his cover and his chance to gain the JBA's trust? Or does he go along and commit this act of necessary evil, with the knowledge that this sacrifice might be what is needed to later save thousands of innocents? Shoot the innocent, and the JBA will entrust him with greater access to their facilities… but Third Echelon might lose faith in Sam’s ability to come through, and withdraw their technological support.

Shack: Will the game have multiple endings that will be determined by the player's pro-JBA or pro-NSA actions?

Daniel Roy: Yes, the game has multiple endings. Depending on Sam's choices, some of the major characters in the game may live or die, and thousands of innocents might be killed, or saved. Sam never becomes pro-JBA... But in some instances, his desperate bid to stop the JBA's actions can result in catastrophic failure.

Shack: Let's say the player is a nice guy at heart and decides to do more for the NSA than the terrorists. Will the evil doers get suspicious, and if so, is there a chance (or more than one) to earn back their trust, or is it game over? Or vice versa: if the player chooses to go more bad than good. Will the NSA attempt to have Sam killed off, or is there a chance for redemption?

Daniel Roy: If the player decides to heed Third Echelon's warnings to the risk of his cover, the terrorists will get suspicious, and there are some dire consequences to this which I will let you discover. Sam can indeed win back their trust, sometimes through treachery and deception, but it's not that easy. On the flip side, if Sam protects his cover at all costs with no regard for Third Echelon's orders, he will be rewarded with greater trust by the terrorists, but innocents will perish. Ultimately, Third Echelon might even stop supporting Sam altogether.

 

[lostboyz]

moto gp 3 is already out, and is quite sexy on xbox, i honestly cant imagine it being better so......


:drool:
:drool:
:drool:

[Deftech]

actually the game isnt being called Moto Gp 3, its Moto GP 2006 last I heard, and its totally different form part 3 thats currently on xbox.

Thank goodness this isn't a port  

[fastTOE]

is there a release date on mgp? bc i really cannot wait.... (or just kinda really don't want to...)

[AClayeJ]

Splinter Cell 4 will own!!!