xboxscene.org forums

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4

Author Topic: Games That Don't Need Sequels  (Read 396 times)

BurnerAzR

  • Archived User
  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 64
Games That Don't Need Sequels
« Reply #30 on: July 09, 2005, 08:26:00 PM »
w00ps ment dead to rights 2... god that game was so bad i forgot the name.
Logged

LowProfileWurm

  • Archived User
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 895
Games That Don't Need Sequels
« Reply #31 on: July 11, 2005, 07:13:00 AM »
QUOTE(Carlo210 @ Jul 9 2005, 06:46 PM)
World of Warcraft isnt a merged RTS and >Platformer<, that's like saying diablo2 is a rts and platformer werge, along with guild wars. They do have their own genre, you know.
Logged

lostboyz

  • Archived User
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2318
Games That Don't Need Sequels
« Reply #32 on: July 11, 2005, 07:30:00 AM »
there just cant be a true RTS on 360 unless they release a keyboard and mouse. nuff said
Logged

Reaper527

  • Archived User
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2066
Games That Don't Need Sequels
« Reply #33 on: July 11, 2005, 05:05:00 PM »
QUOTE(LowProfileWurm @ Jul 7 2005, 04:59 PM)
$20 games.  If a company can't put its heart and soul into a game, then they shouldn't be making one.  I won't buy a game that's less than $40 because I'm *afraid* of what's not worth the $20 inside.  Unless it's a platinum collection, make the game WORTH $40 or more. 
Logged

twistedsymphony

  • Archived User
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6955
Games That Don't Need Sequels
« Reply #34 on: July 11, 2005, 07:54:00 PM »
I agree... I'm all for $20 puzzle games, or $20 ports with improved graphics, or $20 sports games with new rosters... I think there needs to be MORE price points that accurately reflect the amount of content you're getting not just the age of the content.
Logged

LowProfileWurm

  • Archived User
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 895
Games That Don't Need Sequels
« Reply #35 on: July 12, 2005, 07:36:00 AM »
I don't disagree.  I think my original comment was too much of a blanket statement.  I'd prefer to see a quality standard implemented as a means to weed out the trash.  I guess that goes against the free market ideal...  My issue with $20 games of which I have a few (Outlaw Golf 2 and Guilty Gear XX are brilliant), is that I can't distinguish garbage from quality.  Reviewers always take price into account and rate games higher than they deserve with the comment "The game sucks, but for $20, you get what you pay for."  That's the kind of thing I'd like to see abandoned.  Wishful thinking I suppose?
Logged

deftonesmx17

  • Archived User
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 960
Games That Don't Need Sequels
« Reply #36 on: July 12, 2005, 09:03:00 AM »
QUOTE(LowProfileWurm @ Jul 7 2005, 10:59 AM)
I'd like to see FIFA die off... and be replaced with Winning Eleven.  FIFA2005 has nothing on WE8 except EA's PR muscle.

PES/WE with the full blown license would be great. I have no problem ju7st using the wolf's paych. I prefer to play PES on my PC anyways. beerchug.gif Except Konami needs to understand 360 degree movement. That is the only drawback in PES/WE that the series that FIFA does have.
QUOTE(LowProfileWurm)
$20 games.  If a company can't put its heart and soul into a game, then they shouldn't be making one.  I won't buy a game that's less than $40 because I'm *afraid* of what's not worth the $20 inside.  Unless it's a platinum collection, make the game WORTH $40 or more. 

Are you nuts? I love every ESPN 2K5 sports game. They were all $20. NFL 2K5 made madden look like backyard football. NBA 2K5 plays much better than NBA Live. College Hoops 2K5 smashed march Madness. NHL 2K5 just seems more fun than EA's hockey game. I can't really say much for MLB 2K5 though, as I don't like baseball. I think all sports games should be no more than $20. i mean what are you really getting besides roster updates and minor tweaks.

I do feel that fighting games should be no more than $20. Don't get me wrong, I love Soul Calibur 1& 2 to death, but when do I ever play it single player..........................never.................most people don't.

As for games I feel should die on xbox.....................HALO. As a person that was playing FPS way back in the day, how can anyone think this game is great? You must be either young, only a console gamer, or just a fucking retard.
Logged

LowProfileWurm

  • Archived User
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 895
Games That Don't Need Sequels
« Reply #37 on: July 12, 2005, 09:57:00 AM »
Deftones, I amended my statement.  See above your post.

I don't really like pro sports games (except WE8 and NHL) so I could care less what price bracket they fall in.
With the advent of online fighting, I don't mind dropping $50 on a fighting game if it's worth it... and DOA is really the only one I see that's worth it.
Logged

Andy51

  • Archived User
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 672
Games That Don't Need Sequels
« Reply #38 on: July 12, 2005, 12:21:00 PM »
Dragon Ball Z should die

The James Bond games should die, but please EA build up on the 007: Everything or Nothing... That game was sick! So basically Just Third person shooter of James Bond...

Aha!

Serious Sam!!!

I must say this... Tony Hawk!!! I stopped playing Tony Hawk after the first one for Xbox, It was number 3 in the series I think...

Halo 3... Yes I want no Halo 4... C'mon Bungie, I bet they can make something else? like Gnop 2? hehe....

Jaws... the game isn't out yet, but it looks like crap enough for it not to have a sequel...
Logged

incognegro

  • Archived User
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1764
Games That Don't Need Sequels
« Reply #39 on: July 12, 2005, 01:37:00 PM »
QUOTE
As for games I feel should die on xbox.....................HALO. As a person that was playing FPS way back in the day, how can anyone think this game is great? You must be either young, only a console gamer, or just a fucking retard


Ive played alot of fps's on pc's (before i figured out there were other types of games for pc) and  even though they cause my wrists to hurt like a mother...... i enjoyed them and thought they were (quake 3 is one of my fav games of all time)great. When i got my hands on the first halo i expected to suck cause its on a console but i never had such fun playing a GAME in my life. If you think it suck, you havent played it enough or im a fucking retard  tongue.gif
Logged

Andy51

  • Archived User
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 672
Games That Don't Need Sequels
« Reply #40 on: July 13, 2005, 01:06:00 PM »
pop.gif

Well back when I had a decent computer to play Half life 2, Quake 3, Unreal Tournment...

Basically 2 our of these games barely had any storyline...

Half-Life... (The first one) had a amazing storyline but motherfuker puzzles!!!

As for Halo... Awesome Storyline line, some good Muiltplayer, barely any puzzles... like you know? pushing crates in Half Life??? Not exactly my type of FPS...HALO was smooth...
Logged

deftonesmx17

  • Archived User
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 960
Games That Don't Need Sequels
« Reply #41 on: July 13, 2005, 01:20:00 PM »
QUOTE(incognegro @ Jul 12 2005, 03:48 PM)
If you think it suck, you havent played it enough or im a fucking retard  tongue.gif

Neither.  tongue.gif I don't like any console shooter. I even tried to give Halo a go with the PC version............it still sucked IMO.
Logged

incognegro

  • Archived User
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1764
Games That Don't Need Sequels
« Reply #42 on: July 13, 2005, 02:59:00 PM »
i agree on the pc halo statement (im agreeing with deftones.....wow) it sucked! really bad. Some games should stick to their guns (so to speak).Lets hope no more pc halos are in the making....
Logged

JimmyDeushku

  • Archived User
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 393
Games That Don't Need Sequels
« Reply #43 on: July 14, 2005, 09:38:00 PM »
tongue.gif  All of those 2D games like Streetfighter DEFINETLY don't need sequels. Soul-Calibur is gay too. Half-Life 2 is awesome and needs many more sequels.
Logged

corridon

  • Archived User
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 112
Games That Don't Need Sequels
« Reply #44 on: July 14, 2005, 10:54:00 PM »
QUOTE(incognegro @ Jul 14 2005, 08:10 AM)
i agree on the pc halo statement (im agreeing with deftones.....wow) it sucked! really bad. Some games should stick to their guns (so to speak).Lets hope no more pc halos are in the making....
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
« previous next »