what is the diference between using xell-1f.bin and xell-2f.bin??? i'm thinking that it is better to use the xell-2f.bin, because when I was reading the readme file I saw:
" Files: (Another set of the same for Cygnos compatibility)
The main difference here is the loading address, various versions have been built
and used at different times for different setups, I've inclused all that I know of.
Rename one of these files to "updslot0.bin"
File Name: Loading Address: Example use:
xell-1f.bin 0x1c000000 original jtag hack, XBReboot_1, XBReboot_2
* xell-2f.bin 0x1c040000 XBReboot_3, freeboot .1, freeboot .2
xell-readcd.bin 0x01310000 King Kong exploit
xell-serial.bin 0x01300000 King Kong exploit
* Most current applications require this one."
I'm going to flash the XBR_JasperBB_8955_3 version and also it is told that most current applications requires xell-2f.bin...
I should use the xell-2f.bin or xell-1f.bin??? to do so it is correct to just change the command to:
nandpro lpt: +W16 xell-2f.bin 30
thanks for the excellent tutorial
