QUOTE(Rustmonkey @ Jan 13 2007, 10:19 AM)

MS can't feasibly resign the kernal everytime they patch it, can they? That would be pretty big risk, considering the data could be pulled during the update process... so speculation about a "hacked" update to the kernal may be founded....
Yes, it is feasable, and it is done. Yet if you re-read the original post, you would find that the original kernel is signed, and all the patches are signed. They are signed and encrypted before being sent to your xbox360 over xbl, so it is not a security risk. What I don't know is if this means the final patched kernel is signed or not... By way of the transitive property it is, but is there a final signature for the patched kernel (possibly located in the patch, or is that even possible)?