My theory! (IMG:
style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
the controller chip looks like on
Samsung SH-D162D drives (MT1308E IDE) or
Asus DVD-E616A3 (MT1309E SATA) drives, the SPI ROM is now inside the MT1319L.
I think this is the major difference, so where is no problem at all!! the drives are still flashable.
btw. The same move you will see at
Hitachi/LG GDR-H20N (MN103SD6FDA SATA) PC drives. the 256kb flash is now embedded.
who knows, maybe we will see soon new HL v90 drives (IMG:
style_emoticons/default/tongue.gif)
I was thinking the only way we were going to combat a read-only situation was to timing attack/KK/linux/dump dvd-key and inject into a 'modchip' that controls the drive. Not fun!
Yes but it doesn't say Benq anywhere on the drive whereas the old ones do.
I know they are all pretty much the same but I thought it would save confusion by naming this drive a lite-on.
Old Drive
http://pictures.xbox-scene.com/xbox360/benq/Picture013.jpgNew drive
http://i286.photobucket.com/albums/ll88/sl...21042008079.jpgBasically you could call it either. I'll be calling it a lite-on so I don't get confused.
I agree that it is best to start calling this drive lite-on. Hence why I posted news with 'lite-on' and not 'benq'. They may be the same manufacturer now, but its still a new drive that specifies 'lite-on' and not 'benq'.