xboxscene.org forums

Author Topic: Original Xbox Games On Iextreme 1.4  (Read 40 times)

whoops124

  • Archived User
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 18
Original Xbox Games On Iextreme 1.4
« on: February 10, 2008, 11:02:00 AM »

I downloaded a backup of San Andreas, as my disk is unreadable (I do own it)

and it has been made to work with the original xbox... when I go to play it in my xbox 360 (ixtreme 1.4) I get an error saying the game won't work.

Is there something special I have to do to make it work? Will the 360 read original xbox backups that have been patched and such, or do I need a 1:1 copy?

This post has been edited by whoops124: Feb 10 2008, 07:03 PM
Logged

m82a1

  • Archived User
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 206
Original Xbox Games On Iextreme 1.4
« Reply #1 on: February 10, 2008, 01:42:00 PM »

im not a mod, but u DOWNLOADED a game, thats illegal, its in the rules, doesn't matter if you own the original
Logged

RRoD420

  • Archived User
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 306
Original Xbox Games On Iextreme 1.4
« Reply #2 on: February 10, 2008, 02:53:00 PM »

If you download an iso you're on your own. This forum doesn't support piracy. If you really own the game, there are many tutorials to create a PROPER backup that will work fine with ixtreme 1.4.

The mods will suspend/ban you from the forum if they havent already.
Logged

whoops124

  • Archived User
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 18
Original Xbox Games On Iextreme 1.4
« Reply #3 on: February 10, 2008, 04:10:00 PM »

QUOTE(RRoD420 @ Feb 10 2008, 10:53 PM) *

If you download an iso you're on your own. This forum doesn't support piracy. If you really own the game, there are many tutorials to create a PROPER backup that will work fine with ixtreme 1.4.

The mods will suspend/ban you from the forum if they havent already.



ok... I won't burn the iso... is it still legal to make a copy of my friend's san andreas, even though mine is scratched
Logged

Toddler

  • Archived User
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 743
Original Xbox Games On Iextreme 1.4
« Reply #4 on: February 10, 2008, 07:06:00 PM »

Just a little observation for my pious friends...thanks to the DMCA, copying your own original is just as illegal as copying a friend's or downloading an ISO.
Logged

whoops124

  • Archived User
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 18
Original Xbox Games On Iextreme 1.4
« Reply #5 on: February 10, 2008, 08:19:00 PM »

so ignore the rest of the thead... does iextreme 1.4 only accpet 1 to 1 copies of xbox games? Is there anyway to make a patched xbox game play in it?
Logged

cloudboy

  • Archived User
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 35
Original Xbox Games On Iextreme 1.4
« Reply #6 on: February 10, 2008, 10:56:00 PM »

QUOTE(Toddler @ Feb 11 2008, 03:06 AM) *

Just a little observation for my pious friends...thanks to the DMCA, copying your own original is just as illegal as copying a friend's or downloading an ISO.


That's not true... It is perfectly legal to make one backup copy of an original disc that you own. You are only legally permitted to have one in use at a time. I really don't know if you are allowed to download a disc that you own, but I honestly can't see anyone ever going to jail for downloading a game they have.


QUOTE(whoops124 @ Feb 11 2008, 04:19 AM) *

so ignore the rest of the thead... does iextreme 1.4 only accpet 1 to 1 copies of xbox games? Is there anyway to make a patched xbox game play in it?


I believe that ixtreme only accepts 1:1 backups. Try the iso in dvdmulleter? If the security sectors and other stealth files haven't been inserted, it won't work. You could try opening the iso in xbox backup creator and running a stealth check also. Or you could always just go buy another copy of the game because it's only like 10 - 15 bucks...
Logged

Toddler

  • Archived User
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 743
Original Xbox Games On Iextreme 1.4
« Reply #7 on: February 11, 2008, 02:13:00 AM »

Assuming you live in America, it is illegal.

Section 1201 of Title 17 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) defines the circumvention of copy protection in any and all circumstances as copyright infringement and specifically prohibits any circumvention of a technological measure in connection with gaining access to or using a work.  This is referred to under the law as a prophylactic regulation, a preventative blanket rule which takes neither context nor intent into account.

MPAA president Jack Valenti defended that interpretation in testimony before the U.S. Congressional Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade and Consumer Protection in 2004.  "Back-up copies are not legal," Valenti said. "The Copyright Act does not say 'buy one movie, get one free.' There is no more a right to a back-up copy of a DVD than a back-up DVD player, lawn mower or set of wine glasses."

While you may not agree with Valenti's interpretation, the government does.  That is why the Digital Media Consumers Rights Act (DMCRA) has twice been introduced into Congress in an attempt to overturn the DMCA's prohibition against making backups for personal use.

The DMCRA bill was introduced to the United States House of Representatives on January 7, 2003 as H. R. 107 by Rick Boucher. The bill was co-sponsored by John Doolittle, Spencer Bachus and Patrick J. Kennedy.

The bill was reintroduced into Congress once again on March 9, 2005 as H. R. 1201, the 'Digital Media Consumers Rights Act of 2005'. The 2005 bill's original co-sponsors were John Doolittle and Joe Barton.

The authors of the bill summarized the DMCRA, in part, as intended to supersede the "Fair Use" definition under the DCMA by stating that "it is not a violation of Section 1201 of Title 17 to circumvent a technological measure in connection with gaining access to or using a work if the circumvention does not result in an infringement of the copyright in the work."

Due largely to intense opposition from copyright holders such as the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA), the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) and the Business Software Alliance (BSA), the DMCRA bill was never even brought before Congress for a vote.  Thus, the prevailing legal opinion is that Section 1201 of Title 17 of the DMCA remains the controlling statutory authority in this regard.

Like it or not, that's the law.  Google "case law DMCA" or "321 Studios DMCA" if you want to see for yourself the legal opinions, case briefs, rulings, etc. which define your rights (or lack thereof).
Logged