QUOTE(magic_man185 @ May 21 2007, 10:49 PM)

so if we were lucky enough to not get banned, but have previously played burned disks, then we should not even play backups offline? Because of possible detection by kernel?
We already know that the amount of power up's are stored in the nand flash. We suspect that e64 (no dvd unit attached) and other errors are also stored. It is just as easy for them to check c/r, dmi, pfi to create a error report to flag and store.
QUOTE(PerfectGun @ May 21 2007, 11:08 PM)

Ahhh the big mouths of the internet strike again! Can't even keep quiet about this until the damn thing is released... MS Thanks you for your complete coverage of C4E's working so it can be defeated day 1.
This place is crawling with narcs and you post this info... pfftt
We have been playing backups on live for a year. ...Yes, *a year*. It has taken them a whole year to implement a security, and within 2-3 days we have already discovered and defeated it. What more do you really think they have up their sleeve? With billions of dollars to throw into security, dont you think if they had a full-proof solution they would have implemented it first-bang? Think from a buisness perspective, instead of a ignorant-consumer prospective for a second, and I think you'll realize your statements lack of logic.
QUOTE(nickolasj80 @ May 21 2007, 11:17 PM)

The article states that the new FW won't be able to read DVD5, what about xbox1 single layers?
DVD5 = Single Layer
QUOTE(blue_calx @ May 21 2007, 11:34 PM)

Is there a guide on how to make a ODD adapter similar to the Xecuter connectivity kit?
I don't want to buy that whole kit if all i need is to get the xbox360 drive adapted to a molex connection.
Note: I tried searching around and couldn't find one.
No. however, perhaps someone will make one now.
QUOTE(wellmodded @ May 21 2007, 11:37 PM)

just wonderign since Samsung drive are soo good at sleathing and stuff if i spoofed a sammy drive so it can work on my xbox360 which ahs a hatchi would that be ok
It is not that MS see's your drive as a samsung, its that their method of checking the dmi/pfi is reported incorrectly (and therefore flagged) from a hitachi. Spoofing mean's nothing.
QUOTE(PerfectGun @ May 21 2007, 11:39 PM)

Of course, but let's at least get it in the hands of the people before giving them all the tools. Now they know this is coming maybe instead of slowing banning they are going to change the numbers and just drop the hammer on everyone?? Once your banned your done.. So I would at least like a chance to try it before MS kills my Live connection. If I was MS now that I see this coming I would take an even closer look at the numbers(since MS has been logging for awhile we now know) and if I see anything out of the ordinary ban them now before they have a chance to run this FW.
I just think all this info should of waited until the binary was released.
Read above. We've been saying this is going to be a cat/mouse game to come for almost a year....we are just experiencing it now. No surprise. There are a few other ways for MS to detect, but they are being patched, or are unreliable (lots of non-modded users will be banned)