Print

[PlasmaGhost]

Wait a minute. I'm talking about the container files, LIVE containers. Not XEX files. LIVE containers shouldn't use encryption because we can extract files out, correct? The containers are probably signed with an encryption key much like Halo 2 maps.

This entire statement is a guess so don't laugh or flame please.

[Vegita]

I am running Vista Quantum Edition on my AMD quantum processor... give me the program and files I can crack it in 1 hr.

[FrEaKsHoW12390]

right. 1 hour i dont believe you

[travis134sg]

If he really did have a quantum computer, that would easily be possible. Instead of using 1's and 0's it uses physical properties of subatomic particles.

I heard about them on NPR, don't remember much though. Look into Quantum Mechanics, The Double Slit Experiment, M-Theory, and Theoretical Science.

[jameswalter]

QUOTE(travis134sg @ Dec 3 2006, 07:13 PM)

If he really did have a quantum computer, that would easily be possible. Instead of using 1's and 0's it uses physical properties of subatomic particles.

I heard about them on NPR, don't remember much though. Look into Quantum Mechanics, The Double Slit Experiment, M-Theory, and Theoretical Science.

Yep....but it wouldn't take an hour...it would be done instantly.

[vax11780]

QUOTE(jameswalter @ Dec 3 2006, 10:17 PM)

Yep....but it wouldn't take an hour...it would be done instantly.

There is an interesting chapter in Bruce Schnier's book 'Applied Cryptography' which discusses key lengths and the computational effort required to factor large numbers. It is a good read if you are interested in brute forcing any of the signing keys, or even applying GNFS to the factoring effort.

Basically, it can't be done with current algorithms, even with a quantum computer.

Chapter 7 in the second edition if memory serves. I seem to have misplaced my copy during my last move.

VAX

[PlasmaGhost]

QUOTE(PlasmaGhost @ Dec 2 2006, 03:31 PM)

Wait a minute. I'm talking about the container files, LIVE containers. Not XEX files. LIVE containers shouldn't use encryption because we can extract files out, correct? The containers are probably signed with an encryption key much like Halo 2 maps.

This entire statement is a guess so don't laugh or flame please.

No one replied? I'm guessing i was wrong.  

[PlasmaGhost]

nice...it says echo off.

The right code would be @echo off.

And yet again, I'm talking about the containers.

[SCVirus]

In a batch file, the @ symbol is the same as ECHO OFF applied to the current line only. As such @echo off turns echo off for the echo off command aswell, obviously not necessary in the above 'code'.

But i'm feeling like a retard for even dignifying what your saying.

[travis134sg]

Lol I remember making bat scripts  

Good luck, I think that you might have a better chance finding the key by running that bat file then actually making a script that was meant to crack the encryption.

[PlasmaGhost]

QUOTE(SCVirus @ Dec 5 2006, 05:56 PM)

In a batch file, the @ symbol is the same as ECHO OFF applied to the current line only. As such @echo off turns echo off for the echo off command aswell, obviously not necessary in the above 'code'.

But i'm feeling like a retard for even dignifying what your saying.

You obviously have no clue as to what you're talking about.

CODE

echo off
echo hello
pause

That bat file will display this in command prompt:

CODE

C:\YourAreANoob>echo off
hello
Press any key to continue . . .

With @echo off instead:

CODE

hello
Press any key to continue . . .

I have no idea why you must argue over the stupidest little things.

[SCVirus]

QUOTE

As such @echo off turns echo off for the echo off command aswell, obviously not necessary in the above 'code'.

QUOTE

I have no idea why you must argue over the stupidest little things.

Dude you're the one who compained about me not using @echo off. It was a fucking joke about how much of a moronic idea you had about breaking the encryption with '4 computers', and you started bitching that I should of done it better. (FYI About containers any signed files are signed with the same de facto unbreakable key, whether or not they are encrypted.)

[PlasmaGhost]

QUOTE(SCVirus @ Dec 5 2006, 09:21 PM)

FYI About containers any signed files are signed with the same de facto unbreakable key

CODE

echo Instead of you being an asshole you could have told me that in the first place

[Infamousx241]

Although jameswalter is a total cunt who pulls more things out of his ass than a porn star, it is fairly unreasonable to think you could crack a 2048 bit RSA key.

*holds back on flaming the living fuck out of jameswalter for being a pretentious cunt*

[peetyboy2006]

QUOTE

Although jameswalter is a total cunt who pulls more things out of his ass than a porn star, it is fairly unreasonable to think you could crack a 2048 bit RSA key.

*holds back on flaming the living fuck out of jameswalter for being a pretentious cunt*

Woh, somebody woke up with a stick up there ass lmao.

whats jameswalter ever done to you? Ive only ever seen him be honest (sometimes brutally) but if your not honest with people they will keep coming back with crappy ideas like: "lets break the encryption keys" and "if i put an xbox gamesave on my memory card then maybe we can softmod the 360 that way".

If the ideas stupid then it deserves to be flamed. So i think your little attack on him is a little uncalled for.

I also think this thread should be closed (for any mods watching) as its gone way off topic and has turned into a flamebating mud slinging match.