QUOTE(broadd @ Apr 8 2005, 01:04 AM)
- the number of maps Halo 2 came with in the first place was on the average side, and there seems no reasonable explanation for not including more of the Halo 1 and Halo PC maps in the first place.
most of the halo1 maps wouldnt work well with the new weapon set, and they didnt want to remake all the old ones as peopl WOULD have complained "why not new maps instead of old"?
QUOTE
- it's Bungie/MS' choice to incur the development costs because they don't release map editing tools to the community to make their own maps as a labor of love, which could then be distributed by Bungie. In other words, if we want different maps, we have little choice but to buy them from Bungie; which disadvantages Xbox players over PC players who can access the multitude of quality free maps developed by gamers for PC games.
this argument makes NO sense whatsoever: think about it a bit more and youll see why... that or some other logical person can come along and explain it to you, im too tired...
QUOTE
- if you do buy all the maps online in order to get them early, you should be able to get a voucher entitling you to a discount purchase of the disc when it comes out, as otherwise people are going to be paying $20 twice to get all the content.
you would only be paying for an additional 2 maps early, the next wave of dlc and the disk come out the same day, youd be an idiot to dl them and then go pay for the disk later that day...
QUOTE
- I have no idea of MS pockets all the income from Live subscriptions, but I think a better system would be for the producers of popular games to get a commission from that income and used that to fund new content.
while the companies put forth the games that get the players online, they do nothing to keep up the servers, so why should they get a kickback to fund devlopment for additional game items thatll cause more strain on the servers which they dont run?