Print

[throwingks]

^^^
So what?

Give a simple explanation of what you are trying to say.

[jha'dhur]

QUOTE(throwingks @ Jun 16 2006, 01:16 PM)

By the way? Who lived in Israel right before all the Jews were made slaves by the Romans?

There aren't homes in Germany? What is your definition of Anti-Zionism? Can a Jew be an Anti-Zionist?

The Phillistines (called Palestine by the Greeks) had inhabited that land for thousands of years. The Although the Arab peoples are fairly new tenants the religous JEWS of Eastern Europe have no religous or ethnic claims to the land other than British mandate.

Hitler was a religous JEW.

@afruff23

With Iran closely approaching nuclear threshold the Israeli open handed agressions against the palestinians will soon cease.

We shall see if the Israeli gov't is foolish enough to force the issue, once UN process dead ends.

But the Arabs have blood on there hands they arent original inhabitants of any of the lands they hold.

Good for the goose, good for the gander.  

[damam]

@afruff23
i have absolutely no idea what your trying to say.

if your questioning the Amin al-Husayni article because two points in a very long article need citations thats pretty week.  

and that article you posted about the Vichy territory: do you know where the Vichy territory is?  Do you even know the history about why they launched the attack?  Ill give you a hint: it doesnt help your arguement

[throwingks]

QUOTE(jha'dhur @ Jun 19 2006, 10:46 AM)

Hitler was a religous JEW.

No, he wasn't. His mother was Jewish, which according to Jewish law makes him Jewish. However, only his mothers father was Jewish. Not his mother's mother. So you argument is a generation off. Either way, I don't think he had a Bar-Mitzvah

http://www.jewishvir.../hitlerjew.html

[puckSR]

QUOTE

With Iran closely approaching nuclear threshold the Israeli open handed agressions against the palestinians will soon cease.

We shall see if the Israeli gov't is foolish enough to force the issue, once UN process dead ends.

But the Arabs have blood on there hands they arent original inhabitants of any of the lands they hold.

Good for the goose, good for the gander.

So?
Before HUMAN BEINGS were here, the land all belonged to animals?
Should we give it back to them?
It is perfectly acceptable to move from one territory to another, and take over lands along the way.
The only reason the practice is currently suspended is because of the rather structured govts that exist nowadays.

[jha'dhur]

QUOTE(puckSR @ Jun 21 2006, 02:22 PM)

So?
Before HUMAN BEINGS were here, the land all belonged to animals?
Should we give it back to them?
It is perfectly acceptable to move from one territory to another, and take over lands along the way.
The only reason the practice is currently suspended is because of the rather structured govts that exist nowadays.

Whatever, "evolution" boy.