QUOTE
American tactics are cowardly. That is why so many innocent civillians are dead.
Hmm... hypocrit?
I think if you took the number of innocents supposedly killed by American soldiers / the number of American Soliders dead, it will be far less then the number of civilians dead in the WTC buildings / number of highjackers.
But our American soldiers are cowards, I like your thinking.
QUOTE("peg")
American's are killing off thousands of civilians. It is horrible, the soldiers who are fighting just follow orders. Civillians die in war thats why war should be avoided at all costs. In my opinion any soldier who gives their life for a cause, does not die a coward. Most people don't agree with me on this, but I truely do no believe that suicide bombers are cowards. coward-one who shows disgraceful fear or timidity, simply they are not cowards. I am not advocating what they did and the lives that were lost, I am simply saying that they are not cowards.
You didn't answer the question. It's a simple yes or no question, that can be followed by an explaination if need be.
QUOTE
I appreciate that you agree with me, I think that our cowardly tactics are a way of trying to preserve american life. It's a political move, and effected by the fact that we don't have enugh troops over there to wage a proper war. Modern warfair init's self is dis-honerable. But shit happens. The only true honor is in physical combat, but that time is long gone. Hopefully this war will be over asap, and we will get a "coward" as president who trys to keep us out of war.
Don't you win a war when you can finish your objective, with the least amount of casualities on your side? Armies look for weapons that a few people can use to take down a large group. It let's them use less man power, putting less of thier brethren at risk,and getting the job done at the same time. Sure, it can be cowardly, but it's better than pulling a D-day II.