Yesterday we had the biggest storm in Sweden since the sixties. It crushed all electricty in southern Sweden, and destroyed very much in its way, and will cost our small country several billion crowns(1/6th of a dollar). We've had several natural disasters later years, and we're not discussing whether it's got to do with pollution or not, we know it's the pollution. It's PROVEN that the hole in the ozon-layer gets bigger every year, and that it's the reason the arctic ice is melting. And if you say that the hole in the ozon-layer don't have anything to do with environmental problems, then your searching in the wrong end. Norway have got worse problems than we, and they know they'll face even more problems in a near future. So the discussion whether it's a man made problem or not, is not existing. But for some reason Americans will always differ, when others are sure.
Sure, it's acceptible to believe the global warming doesn't have anything to do with the pollution, but to say it CAN'T have anything to do with pollution, is CRAZY and very sad. I'm sure this debate will end pretty soon, the more problem we'll see. No one can defend their beliefs when they have water up their arms. It'll be interesting to see this "debate" in 15 years.
In the late 19th century there was hardly any man made pollution. 100 years later there's man made pollution EVERYWHERE. Billions of cars pouring out gasoline, airplanes and factory pollution was NON existent in the late 19th century. Is it hard to believe this incredible amount of pollution have affected the gloabl warming and other environmental issues? No, but it's strange if one can't see the clear connection. Ignorance won't help the problem, that's all I know.
