xboxscene.org forums

Author Topic: What Is The Most Stable Build Of Xbmc?  (Read 49 times)

falcon101

  • Archived User
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
What Is The Most Stable Build Of Xbmc?
« on: February 26, 2006, 06:39:00 PM »

Out of curiousity, what has been the consensus as far as the MOST stable/error free build of XBMC....the reason i ask is that i just upgraded from 12-16-05 to 2-20-06 and i am still having issues with WEATHER and some other scripts  (IMG:style_emoticons/default/sad.gif) (and i do understand scripts are buggy) I just want it to be PERFECT before i show it to off to my buddies (IMG:style_emoticons/default/tongue.gif)

thanks.
Logged

slumberpod77

  • Archived User
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 523
What Is The Most Stable Build Of Xbmc?
« Reply #1 on: February 26, 2006, 07:00:00 PM »

well, i think this is a matter of understanding what the hell "CVS" actually is, and since i never saw anyone explain it, here's my "normal english" breakdown of it.

the process of "making a program" is fairly complicated and convoluted, but to break it down in a basic way, you get a development environment, and inside of there you write, compile, and test/debug source code. source code in and of itself is NOT a program, at least not in the sense people are used to thinking about. the actual files that you can use (the .XBE file) are compiled from the source code by a compiler, which is basically a program which reads the source code and builds the actual program file out of that source code. to think of it another way, the compiler takes the code that humans can understand and turns it into code that the CPU of the XBox can understand.

that all isn't actually directly involved in CVS, but is neccessary to understand what CVS is and how its used. in modern programming, things are broken down into small pieces to make the program easier to write and understand, as well as allow you to re-use code as much as possible. usually the actual "source code" of a project is broken up into many little files.

now, bearing the above in mind, lets say that you and your friend Jim want to make a program together. CVS is one way of making this easier to do. using a CVS system, the source code for the project is all stored on a server. people who want to can log onto that server and download all the current source. the CVS system keeps track of changes that are made and helps keep the overall project organized, but even so, it's still a bit chaotic. say you have 5 guys all working on the same project. they access the project over the internet and thus don't neccessarily work together following any schedule or anything, so you cannot reasonably expect changes to be made in a regular orderly fashion. instead, say Jim decides he's gonna fix a bug in some part of the project. once he's done he posts it to the CVS and the bug fix becomes part of the project, with a note added into the changelog for the project.

as a result of the above, you can probably understand that an massive and complicated project which is under development like XBMC has changes occuring fairly frequently.

the builds that MOST people use are the T3CH builds, which are simply built off whatever the current CVS is. like i said earlier, when you have a bunch of people working independently, you occasionally have bugs creep in or features that people did not yet have time to 100% finish yet, and the inconsistency of the XBMC CVS builds is a result.

all this really means for you is you're gonna either have to live with the current CVS builds or use only the last "stable" build, which is from a long ass time ago and is missing a ton of new stuff. i hope all that made sense and was illuminating for some people (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Logged

timo1023

  • Archived User
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 173
What Is The Most Stable Build Of Xbmc?
« Reply #2 on: February 26, 2006, 09:08:00 PM »

I think 2-6 was good. I am using 2-12 now and it is a little buggy. I tried 2-18 and it was buggy aswell. The most recent isn't always the best.
Logged

viral_dna

  • Recovered User
  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 58
  • DNA64
What Is The Most Stable Build Of Xbmc?
« Reply #3 on: February 26, 2006, 10:56:00 PM »

I build my own sometimes from cvs, but I sometimes use t3chs and I find the 02-12-06? one to work ok.
some things I don't like are...

Game/DVD won't AutoPlay even when set in settings.
Recording Button Missing?

Thats about the only isues I have right now.
Logged
The virus that infects your mind and frees your soul!

JustinT9669

  • Archived User
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 227
What Is The Most Stable Build Of Xbmc?
« Reply #4 on: February 26, 2006, 11:43:00 PM »

to me all the builds are stable...show off the most recent build. (mc360 would be nice to show off too, when it comes out   (IMG:style_emoticons/default/dry.gif) )
Logged

ChrisF

  • Archived User
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 822
What Is The Most Stable Build Of Xbmc?
« Reply #5 on: February 27, 2006, 12:01:00 AM »

All builds are relatively stable although I am always finding some little issue that is important to me.  In 2_12 you can only get out of the scroll arrows by clicking right - which is counter intutive and I'd remember something like that before.  And then Shoutcast tends to blow up (not sure if it's 1080i) but going straight to the main menu Fubar's the video completely, had it happen in the standard menu too.

To be honest - I'd love a new point release and typically I'm not a beta or CVS person but I'm unwilling to give up all the cool features and go back to 1.1 from over a year ago.
Logged

Sanitarium

  • Archived User
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 44
What Is The Most Stable Build Of Xbmc?
« Reply #6 on: February 27, 2006, 12:31:00 AM »

I use the newest t3ch build all the time.  Right now I have 2-20 and the only issue I have had is that when returning to the home menu from another menu the background picture is blank.  It's not a stability issue, just a bug.  Seems the main stability problems for me are always caused by scripts or the DVD player.  I realize that the team is not responsible for the scripts.
Logged