Ok, so i didn't talk to dev on Irc and he didn't say that? There were other people in the channel when he said it, wasn't a pm-type situation...He didn't say UDE2 would survive anything, he said, of the 2 (UXE and UDE2), as far as M$ changing up things and trying to attack the softmods, UDE2 would have more of a chance, hence the "would stand up over time if any of em did" quote...
Like i said, he did say UXE was what they ultimately wanted, since it's more compatible like u said, But i'm in the USA, and all the boxes i do are USA/NTSC, so UDE2 is enough, and if the guy who made it said it's just as good if not better (in 1 instance) than UXE, I'm going with UDE2....There is a way UDE2 is superior if the guy said so...I know ur a softmod expert krayzie and i'm not disrespecting ur expertise, and i am not an expert, by any means, i was just reporting what i was told...
I can't quite remember dev's explanation on why UDE2 was different from UXE in the way it would be less susceptible, but it might have been something with the way it was signed or something along those lines...I'm sure u know dev, ask him.