Topic: Why Do You Continue To Use Xbmp? (Read 147 times)

loki · « **Reply #15 on:** April 13, 2005, 04:14:00 PM »

i wasnt arguing, i was just stating my sources, sorry

Zzzen · « **Reply #16 on:** June 17, 2005, 03:25:00 AM »

Zzzen · « **Reply #17 on:** June 17, 2005, 03:32:00 AM »

QUOTE

After playing with all the video settings XBMC, I have to say that video quality in XBMP 2.1 is better than XBMC latest build (20/06/05). sharper, brighter, lesser noises...

It' s the 20 May 05 build not 20 june

JayDee · « **Reply #18 on:** June 17, 2005, 04:47:00 AM »

Just to make sure: Are you usinf hardware overlays in XBMC or not? With HW Overlay you should get the same or close to the same qualityin XBMC as in XBMP...

Zzzen · « **Reply #19 on:** June 17, 2005, 06:16:00 AM »

QUOTE

Just to make sure: Are you usinf hardware overlays in XBMC or not? With HW Overlay you should get the same or close to the same qualityin XBMC as in XBMP...

Yes, I have tried this setting too, but still not get the same result.

I tried 2 different divx ( Ghost in the shell 2 for example, perfect quality in XBMP, lesser quality in XBMC, and 'Eternal Sunshine Of The Spotless Mind'...same thing)

may be, it' s about settings, I have played around, I am keen to get any other suggestion to get better quality ?

deltop · « **Reply #20 on:** June 17, 2005, 08:58:00 AM »

Post Processing should be turned OFF in xmbc, it doesn't work properly. As far as I can recall it never worked properly in xbmp either.

But other than that as long as you have Hardware Overlays selected you should be getting pretty much the same quality in xbmc as your getting in xbmp.

Obviously make sure sure options such as Film Grin is turned off too.

Author Topic: Why Do You Continue To Use Xbmp? (Read 147 times)